|
Ljubljana, November 21 2007 - The European
Central Bank executive board member Lorenzo
Bini Smaghi made a reference yesterday
in Vienna to Slovenian macroeconomic
conditions which, in the opinion of the
Ministry of Finance, do not fully reflect
current developments:
- Mr Smaghi mentioned that “Slovenian
fiscal policy, risked causing a “boom-and-bust
cycle” and that “Fiscal policy in Slovenia
is too lax, out of line with what would
be required for macroeconomic stabilization”
Data pertaining fiscal developments, particularly
in 2007, when Slovenia faced adverse supply
side shocks of oil and food prices indicates,
that fiscal policy can hardly be qualified
to be lax. By the contrary, it is restrictive
and has acted countercyclically. In particular
this is the real picture as shown by relevant
fiscal indicators for 2007 (Table 1 and
Figure 1):
- the share of expenditures
in GDP has declined by 1.7% one of the
largest reductions in recent history;
- Government consumption real growth rate
has been reduced by 1.8 percentage points;
- the general government deficit
has been halved from 1.2% to 0.6% and;
- the structural deficit has declined
substantially by 0.6% in accordance with
relevant agreed multilateral fiscal surveillance
procedure. Thus, fiscal policy is not
risking causing a boom-and-boost cycle
but the contrary.
Table 1.
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
General
Government expenditure-to-GDP ratio
(%) |
46,5 |
46,0 |
45,3 |
43,6 |
Change
in Government expenditure-to-GDP
ratio (%) |
-0,7 |
-0,5 |
-0,7 |
-1,7 |
Government
consumption real growth rate (%) |
3,1 |
3,2 |
4,4 |
2,6 |
General
government deficit-to-GDP ratio
(%) |
-2,3 |
-1,5 |
-1,2 |
-0,6 |
Structural
deficit (% of GDP) |
-1,9 |
-1,1 |
-1,4 |
-0,8 |
Source: Statistical Office
of the Republic of Slovenia and Ministry
of Finance
Figure 1

Source: Statistical Office of the Republic
of Slovenia and Ministry of Finance
These developments clearly show that in
line with the Berlin ECOFIN conclusions
of April this year, Slovenia has achieved
its medium-term objective (–1% GDP) two
years earlier than planned.
- Mr. Smaghi also mentioned that “The
economy is growing fast and inflationary
pressures are mounting, with the latest
numbers exceeding 5 percent''. We can
agree with such an statement with certain
caveats as follows:
- Economic growth driven by investment
and exports has picked up in 2007 and
growth is expected to decrease in the
next two years as forecasted by all
relevant institutions. In the next
years government expenditures-to-GDP-ratio
will continue declining and government
consumption growth will remain low.
- The drivers of inflation in Slovenia
have been two supply side shocks: i)
increase in international price of
oil and; ii) increased in international
food prices which given specific circumstances
in the Slovenian economy in 2007 were
reflected in:
- A) high price increase of newly
introduced seasonal food prices in
euro in April 2007 and;
- B) increase of processed food in
the second half of 2007 coinciding
with the lift of no-price increase
commitments
- The effects of supply side shocks
of temporary nature are reflected in
the annual inflation rate but are expected
to fade away in the first half of next
year. Such inflation development scenario
is reflected in the relevant forecasts
of the Slovenian economy.
- The government attributes high importance
to inflationary expectations in inflation
developments, particularly on wage
formation. Recent developments of real
wages indicate that they are lagging
behind productivity growth which is
consistent with macroeconomic stability
(Table 2). Provided that the temporary
supply is not reflected on wage developments,
stable macroeconomic conditions should
continue in the future. In addition,
the growth in exports of 17.1% by the
end of third quarter does not point
to adverse effects on competitiveness.
Table 2.
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007
(estimate) |
2008
(forecast) |
2009
(forecast) |
Gross
wage per employee |
2,0 |
2,2 |
2,2 |
2,4 |
3,7 |
2,8 |
Labor
productivity (GDP per employee) |
4,1 |
4,0 |
4,5 |
3,4 |
3,7 |
3,5 |
Source: Institute of Macroeconomic Analysis
and Statistical Office of the Republic
of Slovenia
PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICE
|